Talk:Dragonheart 4: Battle for the Heartfire/@comment-998602-20170607225330

Hang on, I think I've noticed a pretty big plot hole here:

In the first film Draco declares to Bowen that in order for Einon to die and his evil be destroyed, Bowen has to kill Draco as his half of the heart contains the life source. That implies that someone who a dragon shares their heart with cannot die while the dragon still lives. Heck, Einon even works this out and captures Draco alive for the fact that Einon can't die while Draco is alive - even declaring during his final battle with Bowen "Fool - I'm immortal!"

Yet from what I've read here, it seems that a dragon can share their heart with a human and yet the human can still die while the dragon lives. Under this new rule, Bowen should have been able to kill Einon (and granted, it would have hurt Draco like hell) but Draco would have remained alive without having to die. I could be wrong but if not, that's a pretty big middle finger to the franchise's continuity and - let's be honest - it wasn't that brilliant to start with.

What do you guys think?